Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNuñez Dorantes, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Sibaja, Albino
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Jarquin, José Pastor
dc.contributor.authorSandoval González, Oscar Osvaldo
dc.contributor.authorPosada Gómez, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorAdam Medina, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T14:53:55Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T14:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-10
dc.identifier.citationDorantes, J. C. N., SIBAJA, A. M., JARQUIN, J. P. R., González, Ó. O. S., Gómez, R. P., & Medina, M. A. (2022). Estado actual de estrategias de control en sistemas de recuperación de energía en vehículos eléctricos. DYNA, 97(1), 58-63.es
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorios.orizaba.tecnm.mx:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/608
dc.description.abstractThere is currently an increasing demand for electric vehicles that require greater autonomy and energy efficiency whendriving them. Control strategies in energy recovery systems are crucial to optimize the amount of energy returned to the battery and to ensure safety and stability for the user. In this paper, active fault tolerant control systems (AFTC) and passive fault tolerant control systems (PFTC) with other specialized control strategies (Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Perturbation Rejection Controllers) are compared with classical PID controllers. The results of the simulations show that, keeping the battery voltage constant, returns of about 12% of the battery charge capacity are achieved while the braking time of the vehicles is reduced.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherDYNAes
dc.subjectBraking controllerses
dc.subjectElectric vehicleses
dc.subjectElectric motores
dc.subjectenergy recovery systemes
dc.subjectfault tolerant controles
dc.titleESTADO ACTUAL DE ESTRATEGIAS DE CONTROL EN SISTEMASDE RECUPERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA EN VEHÍCULOS ELÉCTRICOSes
dc.typeArticlees


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem